People and ecosystems

Understanding of the links between coral reef ecosystems, the goods and services they provide to people, and the wellbeing of human societies.


Ecosystem dynamics: past, present and future

Examining the multi-scale dynamics of reefs, from population dynamics to macroevolution


Responding to a changing world

Advancing the fundamental understanding of the key processes underpinning reef resilience.

Coral Bleaching

Coral Bleaching

Coral Reef Studies

ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
James Cook University Townsville
Queensland 4811 Australia

Phone: 61 7 4781 4000
Email: info@coralcoe.org.au

Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image
Facebook Twitter YouTube FlickR

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park management is a model for the world

Aug 2008

International scientists have determined that Australia’s approach on the Great Barrier Reef, where a third of the total area is protected by no-take or ‘green’ zones was a model for how to protect large reef systems under climate change. “The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority have put a lot of effort into determining exactly where these protected zones should be located to give the reef the best over chance of recovery from bleaching events,” he says.

However, many of the world’s “no take” zones are in the wrong places and far too small to protect vulnerable coral reefs from the worst impacts of climate change, an international team of scientists warned today.

Small damselfish shelter within the branches of coral colonies

The team, which includes Nick Graham and Dr Shaun Wilson of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australia, and colleagues from Newcastle University and Wildlife Conservation Society, write in a leading scientific journal that urgent action is needed to prevent the collapse of this important marine ecosystem under climate change.

They warn that many existing “no take areas” (NTAs) in the Indian Ocean and around the world, while effective in protecting local fish, may not be much help in enabling reefs to recover from major coral bleaching events caused by ocean warming.

The research, published in the journal PLoS ONE, is the largest study of its kind ever carried out, covering 66 sites in seven countries in the Indian Ocean and spanning over a decade.

Many of these no-take areas were set up in the late 1960s and early 1970s to protect fish, before climate change and its impact on corals became a major issue, the researchers say. Several of the no-take areas are small, and are surrounded by areas of sea which are heavily fished or otherwise exploited.

These existing zones should not be removed, but new areas are needed in the right places to enable corals to recover from the mass die-offs caused by rising temperatures.

“When you have a major disturbance like bleaching, it can affect a huge area of the reef,” explains Shaun Wilson. “If you have extensive reserve systems, then the chances are much higher they will contain small areas within that escape bleaching which can help to recharge the reef as a whole.

Lead author Nick Graham, who joins CoECRS next month, says “New protected zones need to focus on areas identified as escaping or recovering well from climate change impacts.  But a major focus needs to be shifted towards increasing the resilience of the system as a whole – that means reducing as many other locally derived threats as possible.

“Coral dies when it is put under stress so what we need to be doing is reducing the direct human impact – such as over-fishing, pollution and sedimentation – across the whole area. By removing all these other stresses we are giving the coral the best chance of surviving and recovering from any changes in temperature that may occur as a result of global warming.”

The team has investigated the long-term impact of a major coral die-off across the Indian Ocean caused by warmer waters in 1998. They have tracked declines in coral cover, reef structural complexity, fish species richness and the abundance of various feeding and size groups of reef fish across the Indian Ocean.

“These changes are substantial for some groups, and indicate that little insurance is offered by current small-scale NTA management across the region,” they say.

“We detected declines in fish species richness across the western Indian Ocean in response to loss of live coral cover….the one main exception is Mombasa Marine National Park, Kenya, where species richness and fish density have increased owing to management action.”

The 1998 bleaching event had – and is still having – extensive impacts across the western Indian Ocean. “Geography seems to be a key determinant in the ability of reefs to absorb and recover from such large-scale disturbances and this should be considered for other regions likely to suffer similar large-scale disturbances in the future,” the team says.


More information:
Nick Graham, CoeCRS and Newcastle University (UK), +44 191 222 5091, +44 191 273 2183 or +44 7906135431
Shaun Wilson, COECRS and JCU, +61 7 4781 6067
Jenny Lappin, CoECRS, + 61 7 4781 4222
Jim O’Brien, James Cook University Media Office, +61 7 4781 4822

Graham NAJ, McClanahan TR, MacNeil MA, Wilson SK, Polunin NVC, et al. 2008 Climate Warming, Marine Protected Areas and the Ocean-Scale Integrity of Coral Reef Ecosystems. PLoS ONE 3(8): e3039 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003039


Australian Research Council Pandora

Partner Research Institutions

Partner Partner Partner Partner
Coral Reef Studies

ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
James Cook University Townsville
Queensland 4811 Australia

Phone: 61 7 4781 4000
Email: info@coralcoe.org.au