1

People and ecosystems

Understanding of the links between coral reef ecosystems, the goods and services they provide to people, and the wellbeing of human societies.

2

Ecosystem dynamics: past, present and future

Examining the multi-scale dynamics of reefs, from population dynamics to macroevolution

3

Responding to a changing world

Advancing the fundamental understanding of the key processes underpinning reef resilience.

Coral Bleaching

Coral Bleaching

Coral Reef Studies

ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
James Cook University Townsville
Queensland 4811 Australia

Phone: 61 7 4781 4000
Email: info@coralcoe.org.au

Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image Menu Image
Menu
Facebook Twitter YouTube FlickR

new study raises questions on whether current conservation science and policy for protected areas could be saving more biodiversity—with political and economic expediency often having taken precedence in the past.

Lead author Professor Bob Pressey, from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (Coral CoE) at James Cook University (JCU), said the term ‘save’ in conservation needs to be better defined.

“Across the world, protected areas are established where they least interfere with commercial activities, even though those activities can cause decline and extinction,” Prof Pressey said.

“But ‘saving’ means intervening in a way that prevents the loss of ecosystems and species,” he said.

“There lies the problem. Business as usual means expanding protected areas where they make little difference while threatened biodiversity continues to disappear.”

Prof Pressey said measures other than saving are used to assess conservation progress, and these are often politically convenient: money invested, km2 protected areas established and the number of species contained in national parks. These measures can hide a lack of progress in real conservation.

“What do these measures actually tell us about saving?” he said. “Not much. Real progress in saving biodiversity is measured by how much loss we have avoided.”

While political, institutional and communication barriers are difficult to overcome, conservation measures need to be redefined. As an example, the study suggests the Aichi global Target 11 to increase protected areas to 17% of land and 10% of oceans hampers conservation. The target has instead motivated a race to increase coverage in the most expedient ways, both politically and economically.

Prof Pressey said there is a real risk that post-2020 targets will do the same unless they focus on avoiding loss.

“The future of nature conservation lies in identifying where science and policy can make the most difference—and then measuring, year by year, the difference made,” he said.

The study brought together a team of scientific and policy experts from across Australia, Austria, and the USA. Their results will contribute to ongoing global discussions about the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

“Better science is needed to demonstrate that we can predict where, when, and how we can most effectively save biodiversity,” Prof Pressey said.

“And global policy makers need to revise their expectations and targets to address conservation impact, or avoided loss.”

He said saving biodiversity means developing global guidance for all jurisdictions to implement local interventions.

“With this, we can achieve smarter and more meaningful conservation targets that go beyond the extent of the area being protected.”

PAPER

Pressey R, Visconti P, McKinnon M, Gurney G, Barnes M, Glew L, Maron M. (2021). ‘The mismeasure of conservation’. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.008

CONTACT 

Bob Pressey (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0)418 387 681
E: bob.pressey@jcu.edu.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE (Sydney, AEST)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

A new study reveals the strategies that stop bandits from illegally fishing in Australian waters—but warns there is a cost to the region’s poorer countries.

Co-author Dr Brock Bergseth, from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University, said poachers are simply following the recurring history of human fishing: intensively fish and devastate local resources, then move further afield to—in these cases—fish illegally or poach in other countries’ waters.

“Millions of people rely on fish and seafood and when offered no alternative choice, will chose banditry and illegal fishing to get by,” Dr Bergseth said.

“But without a regional strategy and investments for rebuilding and managing countries’ fisheries, this just becomes one big game of whack-a-mole: you deal with the problem in one area, only for it to pop up in another,” he said.

The study shows how Vietnamese poaching boats, or ‘blue boats’, encroached into Australian waters between 2013 and 2017.

Under a jointly signed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 2017, the Australian Fisheries Management Authority and the Vietnamese Ministry for Agriculture and Rural Development designed and delivered a series of workshop interventions to deter illegal fishing by Vietnamese fishers in Australia between 2017 and 2018.

Both before and after the workshops, 82 fishers were surveyed to understand why they were coming to Australia and also whether the workshop’s explanations of the penalties were effective in shifting perceptions related to reducing illegal fishing.

“The main reason these fishers engaged in banditry was their displacement from their traditional fishing grounds in the South China Sea,” Dr Bergseth said. “This is just one of the implications of an expanding Chinese territory, and it affects countries as far away as Australia.”

Lead author Dr Chris Wilcox, from Australia’s national science agency CSIRO, said since the workshops, there hasn’t been a single sighting of a Vietnamese fishing boat illegally fishing in Australian or Pacific waters.

But, he cautions, while an understanding of the penalties might deter fishers from poaching in Australian waters, they also lose their access to economically viable fish resources.

Captains and their crews opt to fish in other locations, legal or not, even in the face of penalties for doing so.

“Australia can build a wall of steel with patrol boats and surveillance aeroplanes to protect our waters—but without improvements in fish stocks in their legal fishing grounds, Vietnamese vessels will be under pressure to leave in pursuit of revenue. This is creating ongoing issues for our regional neighbours,” Dr Wilcox said.

Reports continue to surface of Vietnamese fishers captured in other regional countries including Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vanuatu.

Dr Wilcox said regional action on the root causes of the problem can solve the issue for everyone. And though this is a long-term project, it also has the best potential for the highest long-term return on investment in terms of reducing illegal fishing.

“Incursions will continue as long as the number of fishing vessels across the region exceeds what the resources can support,” Dr Wilcox said. “While it is essential to keep the enforcement pressure on, this is where coordination across the region could have a positive effect.”

However, he also said tension amongst South East Asian countries over sea borders and other issues still precludes effective coordinated action on illegal fishing.

“Addressing the state of resources in the waters of countries across the region and their ability to collaborate to address vessels illegally crossing borders to fish are the two key ingredients for solving this problem,” Dr Wilcox said.

Dr Bergseth said otherwise, things will only get worse as ocean resources dwindle.

“The decisions we make in the next 5–10 years could well chart the state of our oceans for the next 100,” he said.

PAPER

Wilcox C, Bergseth B. (2021). ‘Effectiveness of interventions to shift drivers of roving banditry and reduce illegal fishing by Vietnamese blue boats’. Conservation Letters. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12823

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the image caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACT

Brock Bergseth (Santa Barbara, PST. Dr Bergseth will be available for interview after 12.01am AEST on Tuesday 13 July 2021)
P: +1 747 299 8875
E: brock.bergseth@jcu.edu.au
Skype: @BrockBergseth

Chris Wilcox (Hobart, AEST)
P: +61 (0)439 397 317
E: chris.wilcox@csiro.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE (Sydney, AEST)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

Five world-renowned scientists have signed a letter to UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay to “thank UNESCO for its leadership in recognising the threat of climate change to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage property.”

Professor Terry Hughes, Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Dr Sylvia Earle, Professor Johan Rockström and Professor Andréa Grottoli sent the letter last night from Australia.

Last month, UNESCO released a draft decision recommending the Great Barrier Reef be inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

The scientists’ letter is a strong show of support for UNESCO from some of the most revered coral reef experts in the world.

They write UNESCO “has made the right decision” to recommend the in Danger listing of the Great Barrier Reef, because “tragically, the Reef has suffered extensive losses in recent years through three severe coral bleaching events, fuelled by global warming.”

They stress that protecting the Reef requires global action to reduce carbon emissions, “yet Australia has so far not pulled its weight in this global effort.”

“An ‘in Danger’ listing for the Great Barrier Reef will focus action on how to limit further damage to the Reef. It presents a challenge to all nations to immediately reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” said Prof Terry Hughes.

“Australia has a lot to lose with current emission pledges only getting us to global surface temperatures of a lethal 3 degrees C above preindustrial levels,” said Prof Hoegh-Guldberg, who also coordinated an Australian Academy of Science report on climate change earlier this year.

“We therefore greatly appreciate UNESCO’s draft recommendation for Australia to urgently address the threat of climate change and welcome the draft report’s recognition that 1.5 degrees C is widely recognised as a critical threshold for the property,” the letter says.

The letter acknowledges efforts by the Australian and Queensland Governments to tackle sediment and nutrient pollution, which were also commended by UNESCO.

But, the scientists add UNESCO’s draft decision “notes with the utmost concern that the water quality targets in the Reef 2050 Plan have not been met.”

Finally, the scientists pledge that they “stand ready to help support UNESCO’s efforts to secure the future of this global icon.”

The 44th session of the World Heritage Committee, held online from 16 to 31 July 2021, will decide whether to accept or modify the draft decision on the Great Barrier Reef.

The Australian government has said it will strongly lobby member countries of the World Heritage Committee to remove the in Danger recommendation.

 

BACKGROUND

Distinguished Professor Terry Hughes FAA is the Founding Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, headquartered at James Cook University, Queensland. In 2018, Nature recognised Professor Hughes as one of the “10 people who mattered this year” for his response to the global coral bleaching event caused by anthropogenic climate change.

Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg FAA is Professor of Marine Studies at the University of Queensland, a Founding Director of the Global Change Institute, and Deputy Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies. He was Coordinating Lead Author on the Impacts chapter of the United Nations IPCC Special report on 1.5 degrees C.

Dr Sylvia Earle is an oceanographer, National Geographic Society Explorer in Residence, and Chair of Mission Blue which aims to achieve 30% protection of the ocean by 2030. She was named by Time Magazine as its first Hero for the Planet in 1998.

Professor Johan Rockström is Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. His climate science work formed the basis of the Sir David Attenborough-narrated Netflix documentary Breaking Boundaries.

Professor Andréa G. Grottoli, based at Ohio State University, is a Fellow and President of the International Coral Reef Society, and Director of the international Coral Bleaching Research Coordination Network.

 

CONTACT

Terry Hughes (Townsville, AEST)
P: 
+61 (0)400 720 164
E
terry.hughes@jcu.edu.au

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg (Brisbane, AEST)
P: +61 (0)401 106 604
E: oveh@uq.edu.au 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE at JCU (Sydney, AEST)
P: + 61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

A new study has found baby coral reef fishes can outpace all other baby fishes in the ocean.

Lead author Adam Downie is a PhD candidate at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU).

Mr Downie said when considering aquatic athletes, young coral reef fishes shine: they are some of the fastest babies, swimming around 15–40 body lengths per second.

As a comparison, herring babies swim up to two body lengths per second, and the fastest human in the water, Olympic gold medalist Michael Phelps, can only swim 1.4 body lengths per second.

“We found the swimming performance in baby fishes relates to whether they ultimately associate with a reef or not,” Mr Downie said.

“When they’re a baby searching for a new reef to call home, a reef fish has to navigate the open ocean and its currents. To be successful at this they need a higher swimming capacity than other non-reef fishes.”

“We think that, over evolutionary time, habitat association shaped the swimming performance in the early life stages of these marine fishes,” said co-author Dr Peter Cowman, also from Coral CoE at JCU and Senior Curator of Biosystematics from Queensland Museum’s Project DIG.

“In our study, we compared more than 200 marine fish species across their 150 million years of shared ancestry. We found baby fishes that settle onto a reef later in life, whether tropical or temperate, have evolved to grow larger muscles and swim faster than their non-reef relatives,” Dr Cowman said.

The reef fish babies develop these muscles as well as their organs very quickly—all signs of great athletes. Other fishes—such as the herring, which remains in the open ocean for its whole life—don’t have these attributes.

“These tiny creatures aren’t just passive particles floating around in the ocean,” said co-author Associate Professor Jodie Rummer, also from Coral CoE and the College of Science and Engineering at JCU. “They are finely tuned athletes.”

“Swimming machinery forms early in a fish’s life—and some just do it bigger, faster and better than others.”

In another recent study, Mr Downie also found the health of the reef that baby reef fishes choose to call home could affect their athletic performance. Settling on degraded coral reefs may require extra energy for these young fishes, which could then compromise their growth, swimming and other vital activities.

“While reef fishes may be exceptional swimmers in early life, the condition of their home can have huge impacts on their performance—and likely their ability to develop into healthy adults,” Mr Downie said.

Coral reefs worldwide are degrading due to climate change, pollution, boat traffic, sediment run-off and coastal development.

“As the global damage to coral reefs persists, future populations of reef fishes are at risk,” Dr Rummer said.

“Compromising the health of baby fishes compromises the health of adult populations and therefore entire marine ecosystems,” she said.

“There are around 17,000 known marine fish species,” Mr Downie said. “They are an important part of any functioning marine ecosystem—not to mention crucial for fisheries, which support nearly half of the world’s human population.”

“Our findings show how important it is to urgently reduce the human impact on these fragile species and ecosystems,” he said.

“Healthy reefs mean healthy fish and a healthy planet.”

 

PAPERS

Downie A, Leis J, Cowman P, McCormick M, Rummer J. (2021). ‘The influence of habitat association on swimming performance in marine teleost fish larvae’. Fish and Fisheries. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12580

Downie A, Phelps C, Jones R, Rummer J, Chivers D, Ferrari M, McCormick M. (2021). ‘Exposure to degraded coral habitat depresses oxygen uptake rate during exercise of a juvenile reef fish’. Coral Reefs. DOI: 10.1007/s00338-021-02113-x

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the image caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACTS

Adam Downie (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0) 403 587 050
E: adam.downie@my.jcu.edu.au

Jodie Rummer (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0) 439 166 171
E: jodie.rummer@jcu.edu.au

Pete Cowman (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0)490 231 223
E: peter.cowman@qm.qld.gov.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE (Sydney, AEST)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

 

New research shows what is often assumed to be ‘fair’ in conservation practice may not be considered so by the very people most affected by it—and a new approach is needed if protected areas are to be effective.

Lead author Dr Georgina Gurney, from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies based at James Cook University, said considering local stakeholder conceptions of fairness in conservation is critical.

“If conservation is perceived as unfair it can lead to conflict, undermining support and cooperation,” Dr Gurney said.

She said it is not only an ethical matter but key to achieving good outcomes for people and the environment.

“But what is fairness? Very few studies have asked this question in the context of conservation, especially marine protected areas.”

The researchers asked Indigenous communities in Fiji (who hold customary tenure rights to land and sea) about the fairness of five alternative approaches to distributing money paid by tourists to dive in a new co-managed marine protected area.

“Our study found local stakeholders considered the ‘most fair’ way to distribute money from the area was according to who held rights over the area,” said co-author Dr Sangeeta Mangubhai, Director of the Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji Country Program.

“They thought the least fair way to distribute money was according to the costs incurred to fishers who were affected by the new rules prohibiting fishing.”

The findings challenge common assumptions in much of the conservation literature and practice about what constitutes distributional fairness. These often focus on equality and forgone economic benefits of resource extraction, such as fishing.

“Our findings help clarify fairness in global environmental policies and agreements,” Dr Mangubhai said. “Explicitly identifying what is considered fair by those most affected by conservation is important during both the planning and evaluation processes.”

“This practice is especially important in low- and middle-income countries. Conservation practice and policy undertaken in these countries are often shaped by that developed in rich Western countries, which means they are underpinned by Western ideas about fairness.”

“As the coverage of conservation areas is expected to grow to 30% of the world’s surface by 2030, more attention should be given to what local stakeholders consider is fair with regards to related decision-making and the distribution of associated costs and benefits,” Dr Gurney said.

“To help make sure existing and new protected areas work, we need to move beyond tacit assumptions about what constitutes fair management to explicit identification of local conceptions of fairness.”

“Otherwise, we risk the chance of support for the protected area being eroded.”

PAPER

Gurney G, Mangubhai S, Fox M, Kiatkoski Kim M, Agrawal A. (2021). ‘Equity in environmental governance: perceived fairness of distributional justice principles in marine co-management’. Environmental Science & Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.022

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the image caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted. 

CONTACT

Dr Georgina Gurney (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0)415 465 712
E: georgina.gurney@gmail.com

Dr Sangeeta Mangubhai (Suva, Fiji, GMT+12)
E: smangubhai@wcs.org

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE (Sydney, AEST)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

New research on the growth rates of coral reefs shows there is still a window of opportunity to save the world’s coral reefs—but time is running out.

The international study was initiated at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (Coral CoE), which is headquartered at James Cook University (JCU).

Co-author Professor Morgan Pratchett from Coral CoE at JCU said the results show that unless carbon dioxide emissions are drastically reduced the growth of coral reefs will be stunted.

“The threat posed by climate change to coral reefs is already very apparent based on recurrent episodes of mass coral bleaching,” Prof Pratchett said. “But changing environmental conditions will have other far-reaching consequences.”

Co-author Professor Ryan Lowe, from Coral CoE at The University of Western Australia (UWA), said modern coral reef structures reflect a balance between a wide range of organisms that build reefs, not just corals. This includes coralline algae—a rock-hard alga that bind reefs together.

“While the responses of individual reef organisms to climate change are increasingly clear, this study uniquely examines how the complex interactions between diverse communities of organisms responsible for maintaining present day coral reefs will likely change reef structures in the future,” Prof Lowe said.

The joint lead authors, Dr Christopher Cornwall and Dr Steeve Comeau (who are now at Victoria University of Wellington and Sorbonne Université CNRS Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche sur Mer, respectively) calculated how coral reef growth is likely to react to ocean acidification and warming under three different climate-change carbon dioxide scenarios: low, medium and worst-case.

The findings suggest that under an intermediate emissions scenario, some reefs may even keep pace with sea-level rise by growing—but only for a short while.

“All reefs around the world will be eroding by the end of the century under the intermediate scenario,” said co-author Dr Scott Smithers, from JCU. “This will obviously have serious implications for reefs, reef islands, as well as the people and other organisms depending upon coral reefs.”

The study gives broader projections of ocean warming and acidification—and their interaction—on the net carbonate production of coral reefs.

Warming oceans bring more marine heatwaves, which cause mass coral bleaching. Ocean acidification affects the ability of calcifying corals to form their calcium carbonate skeletons, a process called ‘calcification’. Warming waters also reduce calcification.

The data in the study include net calcification, bioerosion and sediment dissolution rates measured or collated from 233 locations across 183 distinct reefs. 49% of the reefs were in the Atlantic Ocean, 39% in the Indian Ocean and 11% in the Pacific Ocean.

These were then modelled against three Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emissions scenarios for low, medium and high-impact outcomes on ocean warming and acidification for 2050 and 2100.

The projections show that even under the low-impact case, reefs will suffer severely reduced growth, or accretion, rates.

“While 63% of reefs are projected to continue to accrete by 2100 under the low-impact pathway, 94% will be eroding by 2050 under the worse-case scenario,” Dr Cornwall said. “And no reef will continue to accrete at rates matching projected sea-level rise under the medium and high-impact scenarios by 2100.”

“Our study shows changing environmental conditions challenge the growth of reef-building corals and other calcifying organisms, which are important in maintaining the structure of reef systems,” Prof Pratchett said.

“Saving coral reefs requires immediate and drastic reductions in global carbon emissions.”

PAPER

Cornwall C, Comeau S, Korndere N, Perry C, Van Hooidon R, DeCarlo T, Pratchett M, Anderson K, Browne N, Carpenter R, Diaz-Pulidoo G, D’Olivo J, Doo S, Figueiredo J, Fortunato S, Kennedy E, Lantz C, McCulloch M, González-Rivero M, Schoepf V, Smithers S, Lowe R. 2021. ‘Global declines in coral reef calcium carbonate production under ocean acidification and warming’. PNAS. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015265118

CONTACTS

Morgan Pratchett (AEST, Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0)488 112 295
E: morgan.pratchett@jcu.edu.au

Ryan Lowe (AWST, Perth, Australia)
P: +61 (0)466 492 719
E: Ryan.Lowe@uwa.edu.au

Scott Smithers (AEST, Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0)428 752 433
E: scott.smithers@jcu.edu.au

Chris Cornwall (NZST, Wellington, New Zealand)
E: christopher.cornwall@vuw.ac.nz

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE (AEST, Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

A world first study within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park has found limited fishing zones (yellow zones) are still important conservation and fisheries management tools when paired with no-fishing zones.

Lead author Dr April Hall, from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU), said partially protected yellow zones still contain healthy numbers of reef fish targeted for recreational and commercial fishing. These include coral trout, tropical snappers, emperors and tuskfish.

Yellow zones limit, rather than prohibit, fishing through fishing gear restrictions. For example, limited line fishing is allowed with one rod or line and one hook per person.

“We found the numbers of popular fishing targets in these yellow zones are up to 69 percent of what they are in the adjacent no-take green zones,” Dr Hall said.

Green zones, where all fishing is prohibited, are more frequently studied areas. Their benefits to conservation and flow-on fisheries are already well-established.

Though there were fewer fishing targets in the yellow zones, both yellow and green zones had similar abundances of non-target fishes and richness of fish species overall.

“Both green and yellow zones supported a great diversity of fish species,” Dr Hall said.

Yellow zones were set aside as partially protected areas in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority’s (GBRMPA) 2004 zoning plan. Co-author Darren Cameron, from GBRMPA, said the Great Barrier Reef is one of the world’s largest and most comprehensively studied marine parks. However, this research is the first to specifically address yellow zones.

“We found yellow zones, in conjunction with green zones, are an effective management tool. They contribute to marine park conservation goals whilst positively supporting fishing opportunities,” Mr Cameron said.

The study took place within the Hinchinbrook and Dunk Island region. The area has outstanding biodiversity and cultural heritage. It is an important area for recreational, commercial and indigenous fishing. The study also considers zoning on inshore reefs, an area which has previously received little attention.

The project is a collaboration between Coral CoE at JCU and GBRMPA, as part of Dr Hall’s Advance Queensland Post-Doctoral Fellowship. The analyses form part of her broader project evaluating yellow zones across the Great Barrier Reef.

“Data from our project will be critical for conservation and fisheries alike,” Dr Hall said.

PAPER

Hall A, Cameron D, Kingsford M. 2021. ‘Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs’. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the image caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACTS

April Hall (Coral CoE at JCU, Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 458 565 194
E: april.hall@jcu.edu.au

Darren Cameron (GBRMPA, Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 438375569
E: Darren.Cameron@gbrmpa.gov.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne (Coral CoE at JCU, Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

###

What is a Yellow Zone?

Fishing activities allowed in a Conservation Park (Yellow) Zone include:

For a description of the full range of Great Barrier Reef Marine Park zones and their restrictions, see here.

Today, the British Ecological Society announced Dr Renato Morais from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University as the winner of this year’s Haldane Prize.

The prize is given each year to the best paper in the journal Functional Ecology from an early career author. Dr Morais was awarded the prize for: Severe coral loss shifts energetic dynamics on a coral reef.

Dr Morais led an international team of researchers comparing reef survey data from 2003–2004 and 2018 at Lizard Island. The team evaluated how the metrics of energy flow and storage that underscore critical coral reef function responded to severe coral loss. The losses followed cyclones in 2014 and 2015 and bleaching events in 2016 and 2017.

“What we found was counter-intuitive,” Dr Morais said. “In the 15 years punctuated by recurring catastrophic events of coral loss, reef fish assemblages became more, not less, productive.”

Dr Morais explained this was because the increased occurrence of larger, and presumably older, herbivorous fishes was linked to a massive increase in their favoured food: short algal turfs that quickly colonise dead corals.

Yet, the team found rates of biomass ‘recycling’ (i.e., turnover) decreased during this period, likely because large fish grow proportionally less than small ones.

“Overall, our results cautioned against interpreting the extra productivity following coral loss as necessarily positive, as it may not be stable in the long run if old fish are not replenished,” Dr Morais said.

“I am grateful for having the opportunity to develop an interesting, yet unexpected, project during my PhD, and very thrilled to accept the 2020 Haldane Prize for the paper.”

Enrico Rezende, Senior Editor of Functional Ecology said: “By combining detailed longitudinal surveys with sound theoretical analyses, Dr Morais and his colleagues provide a detailed account of the shift in energy dynamics during the degradation of a coral reef.”

The British Ecological Society (BES) awards its journal prizes annually. The prizes are for each of the seven BES journals: Functional EcologyJournal of Animal EcologyJournal of Applied EcologyJournal of EcologyMethods in Ecology and EvolutionPeople and Nature, and for the first time, Ecological Solutions and Evidence.

The winning papers are selected by the Senior Editors of the journals. The awards are presented to the winners at the BES Annual Meeting in Liverpool.

The winners receive a prize of £250, membership of the BES, a year’s subscription to the respective journal and a contribution to the costs incurred in attending the BES Annual Meeting in the UK if they wish to give a presentation on their work.

British Ecological Society

Founded in 1913, the British Ecological Society (BES) is the oldest ecological society in the world. The BES promotes the study of ecology through a range of scientific literature, funding and events, education initiatives and policy work. The society has around 6,500 members from nearly 130 different countries. www.britishecologicalsociety.org

The most extensive reef survey of the Coral Sea Marine Park ever undertaken will continue this week as scientists from ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE) and Parks Australia staff set sail from Gladstone, Queensland.

The voyage will improve our understanding of coral reef health and fish communities as well as providing an opportunity to discover new marine species and measure levels of ocean pollution.

Director of National Parks Dr James Findlay said the project would monitor 20 large reef ecosystems in the Coral Sea Marine Park annually over the next three years, with this voyage heading out to the most remote and isolated reefs in the Coral Sea.

“Parks Australia is proud to be conducting this major voyage into Australia’s largest marine park,” said Dr Findlay. “This expedition will focus on the southern-most reefs, including the remote Mellish Reef which lies more than 800 kilometres off the Australian mainland.

“With a management plan coming into effect for the Coral Sea for the first time in July this year, it is very important that we monitor the health of these isolated coral reef ecosystems and increase our understanding of these amazing places. The voyage will also be assessing micro-plastics in the Coral Sea Marine Park and removing marine debris from the islets and cays.”

Voyage leader, Coral CoE’s Professor Morgan Pratchett, said this voyage would increase our understanding about how reefs are connected, the impact of coral bleaching, and reef recovery.

“Our last voyage showed that some reefs have been affected by bleaching, but we saw some signs of recovery. If no further bleaching occurs, these reefs will continue to recover and may play an important role in the broader recovery of our tropical reef systems,” said Professor Morgan Pratchett.

This is the third voyage in the first year of a three-year project to survey reefs in the Coral Sea Marine Park and follows an October voyage to the Coral Sea’s northern reefs where scientists found coral species never before recorded in Australian waters.

The voyage leaves from Gladstone O’Connell Wharf at 2 am on 4 December 2018 and disembarks at Townsville on 19 December (mid-morning).

The Coral Sea Marine Park has significant populations of internationally threatened species, as well as species found nowhere else in the world. Visit the Coral Sea page to learn more about this fascinating ecosystem.

 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE at JCU (Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

 

Scientists have used modern genetic techniques to prove age-old assumptions about what sizes of fish to leave in the sea to preserve the future of local fisheries.

“We’ve known for decades that bigger fish produce exponentially more eggs,” said the lead author of the new study, Charles Lavin, who is a research fellow from James Cook University (JCU) and Nord University in Norway.

“However, we also found while these big fish contributed significantly to keeping the population going—they are also rare.”

Co-author Dr Hugo Harrison from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at JCU said as fish grow older, they become more fertile and their chances of having babies increase.

“This is an age-old assumption of fisheries management—and with the help of modern genetics, we can show that this assumption is correct.”

“But the smaller fish are just as important to keeping populations going. They may have fewer babies, but they also are more abundant.”

The study used genetic parentage analysis to identify which adult coral groupers (Plectropomus maculatus) contribute to replenishing fished populations in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP).

The authors found that large coral groupers are important because they are more likely to replenish the fish stocks removed from the fishery. However, smaller fish are still making a meaningful contribution.

“We show that minimum size-limits on catches are effective at protecting the reproductively mature coral grouper,” Mr Lavin said. “This ensures all fish have the opportunity to reproduce at least once prior to being caught.”

The authors said all fisheries must ensure there are enough fish reproducing to replace the portion of the population that are caught.

“We’re fortunate in the GBRMP to have measures in place that protect both the small and larger fish,” Dr Harrison said.

“These ensure our fisheries remain sustainable and can bounce back quickly after a disturbance.”

In the GBRMP, catches of coral grouper are limited by size and catch limits, as well as seasonal closures to ensure the fishery is productive and sustainable.

“It’s encouraging that these measures are effective,” Mr Lavin said.

“But it’s important that we also protect the bigger, rarer fish inside no-take marine reserves because they are super-productive,” he said.

“For the fisher, this means there will always be fish to catch.”

###

PAPER

Lavin C, Jones G, Williamson D, Harrison H. (2021). ‘Minimum size limits and the reproductive value of numerous, young, mature female fish’. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2714

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the image description document. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACT

Hugo Harrison (Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 499 523 939
E:
hugo.harrison@jcu.edu.au

Charles Lavin (currently travelling)
E: charles.p.lavin@nord.no

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE at JCU (Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

 

 

Scientists say outdated assumptions around gender continue to hinder effective and fair policymaking and action for climate mitigation and adaptation.

Lead author of a new study, Dr Jacqueline Lau from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU) and WorldFish, said gender—alongside other identities like race, class and age—has a powerful influence on people’s experience of, and resilience to, climate change.

She said the four most common and interlinked assumptions found are: women are innately caring and connected to the environment; women are a homogenous and vulnerable group; gender equality is a women’s issue and; gender equality is a numbers game.

“Although there is a global mandate to work towards gender equality in climate change mitigation and adaptation, efforts are hindered by a set of assumptions about gender, long critiqued in development studies,” Dr Lau said.

The study draws on post-2014 gender and climate change literature, to give an overview of how the gender assumptions manifest across recent work in adaptation, mitigation and broader climate change policy, practice and research.

The review of the literature takes a closer look at how these assumptions narrowly diagnose the causes of gender inequality.

“As a result, we see too many strategies that have unintended—and even counterproductive—consequences,” said Dr Pip Cohen, from WorldFish.

“For instance, strategies that target women only may overburden them, cause a backlash, or obscure the vulnerabilities of other groups.”

The study offers lessons for a more informed pursuit of gender equality in climate change research, policy and practice.

The authors said progressing gender equality means breaking down stereotypes and prejudices about gender—creating environments to enable all people to exercise their agency to cope, change and adapt.

Dr Lau said she was surprised to find so many examples of gender assumptions in climate change practice. She explained that a first step in disrupting these assumptions is to lay them bare and explain why development research has found them to be problematic.

“The social and cultural expectations about what it is to be a woman or a man in any given society will shape people’s wellbeing,” Dr Lau said.

She said alongside efforts to dismantle broader barriers to gender equality, better and more coordinated efforts are needed from practitioners and researchers to disrupt and counteract unhelpful assumptions.

“Pursuing gender equality in climate change policy and practice is critical, and decades of experience in development offer lessons for how to do it well,” Dr Lau said.

“Ultimately, we want to see equitable opportunities for all people to realise their full potential. Where no one is left behind.”

###

PAPER

Lau J, Kleiber D, Lawless S, Cohen P. (2021). ‘Gender equality in climate policy and practice hindered by assumptions’. Nature Climate Change. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-00999-7

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACT

Dr Jacqueline Lau (Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0)403 990 738
E: 
jacqueline.lau@jcu.edu.au

Dr Pip Cohen (travelling on/off 4 & 5 March)
P: +61 (0)400 468 255 (via WhatsApp will work best)
E: p.cohen@cgiar.org

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE at JCU (Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

BACKGROUND ON WORLDFISH

WorldFish is an international, nonprofit research and innovation institution that creates, advances, and translates aquatic food systems science into scalable solutions. We vision an inclusive world of healthy, well-nourished people and a sustainable blue planet, now and in the future. Our mission is to end hunger and advance progress on the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals through science and innovation to transform food, land, and water systems with aquatic foods for healthier people and the planet.

For over 45-years, WorldFish’s data, evidence, and insights have shaped practices, policies, and investments to end hunger and advance sustainable development in low- and middle-income countries.  We have a global presence across 20 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific, with 460 staff of 30 nationalities deployed where the greatest sustainable development challenges can be addressed through holistic aquatic food systems solutions. Embedded in local, national, and international partnerships, our work sets agendas, builds capacities, and supports decision-making for climate action, food and nutrition security, sustainable fisheries and aquaculture, blue economy, OneHealth, and AgriTech, integrating gender, youth, and social inclusion.

A core element of the 2030 WorldFish Research and Innovation Strategy: Aquatic Foods for Healthy People and Planet is focused on building resilience of aquatic food systems to shocks, which is critical to COVID-19 response and recovery.

WorldFish is part of One CGIAR, the world’s largest agricultural research and innovation network.

For the first time, scientists have assessed how many corals there are in the Pacific Ocean—and evaluated their risk of extinction.

While the answer to “how many coral species are there?” is ‘Googleable’, until now scientists didn’t know how many individual coral colonies there are in the world.

“In the Pacific, we estimate there are roughly half a trillion corals,” said the study lead author, Dr Andy Dietzel from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU).

“This is about the same number of trees in the Amazon, or birds in the world.”

The results are crucial for the research and conservation of corals and coral reefs as they decline across the world due to the effects of climate change.

“We need to know the abundance of a species to assess its risk of extinction,” Dr Dietzel said. “However, there is very little data on most of Earth’s wild animal and plant species—not just corals.”

Dr Dietzel said the eight most common coral species in the region each have a population size greater than the 7.8 billion people on Earth.

The findings suggest that while a local loss of coral can be devastating to coral reefs, the global extinction risk of most coral species is lower than previously estimated.

Extinctions could instead unfold over a much longer timeframe because of the broad geographic ranges and huge population sizes of many coral species.

Co-author Professor Sean Connolly, from Coral CoE at JCU and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, said the study’s new analysis of the 80 species considered by the IUCN to have an elevated extinction risk shows that 12 of those species have estimated population sizes of more than one billion colonies.

“As an example, the finger-coral, Porites nigrescens, ranks amongst the ten most abundant species we examined. It’s also not considered to be highly susceptible to coral bleaching—yet it is currently listed by IUCN as vulnerable to global extinction,” Prof Connolly said.

Co-author Professor Michael Bode from Coral CoE at JCU and the Queensland University of Technology said, “One third of the rarest species in our analysis—covering the bottom ten percent of species abundances—are nonetheless listed by the IUCN as being of Least Concern.”

The study measured the population sizes of more than 300 individual coral species on reefs across the Pacific Ocean, from Indonesia to French Polynesia. The scientists used a combination of coral reef habitat maps and counts of coral colonies to estimate species abundances.

Co-author Professor Terry Hughes from Coral CoE at JCU said the study results have major implications for managing and restoring coral reefs.

“We counted an average of 30 corals per square metre of reef habitat. This translates into tens of billions of corals on the Great Barrier Reef—even after recent losses from climate extremes,” Prof Hughes said.

“Coral restoration is not the solution to climate change. You would have to grow about 250 million adult corals to increase coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef by just one percent.”

He said the study highlights the opportunity for action to mitigate the threats to reef species—and well before climate change causes global extinctions—to make an eventual recovery of reef coral assemblages possible.

“The challenge now is to protect wild populations of corals, because we could never replace more than a tiny percentage of them. Prevention is better than cure,” Prof Hughes said.

“Given the huge size of these coral populations, it is very unlikely that they face imminent extinction. There is still time to protect them from anthropogenic heating, but only if we act quickly on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

PAPER

Dietzel A, Bode M, Connolly S, Hughes T. (2021). ‘The population sizes and global extinction risk of reef-building coral species at biogeographic scales’. Nature Ecology & Evolution. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01393-4

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACT

Dr Andreas Dietzel (Townsville, Australia)
P:
+61 (0)432 916 224
E: 
andreas.dietzel@my.jcu.edu.au

Prof Sean Connolly (Panama, Central America)
P: (available on request)
E: ConnollyS@si.edu

Prof Michael Bode (Brisbane, Australia)
P: +61 (0)414 108 439
E: michael.bode@qut.edu.au

Prof Terry Hughes (Townsville, Australia)
P: 
+61 (0)400 720 164
E
terry.hughes@jcu.edu.au 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE at JCU (Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

Scientists have discovered a never-before-seen biodiversity pattern of coral reef fishes that suggests some fishes might be exceptionally vulnerable to environmental change.

A new study shows plankton-eating coral reef fishes (planktivores) are far more diverse than others in the Indo-Australian Archipelago, a global marine biodiversity hotspot.

The findings highlight, for the first time, a unique link between the diet and distribution of species across the marine realm.

“The archipelago is one of the most complex and dynamic geological regions in the tropics,” said lead author Dr Ale Siqueira from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU). “And its fishes underpin its status as a biodiversity hotspot.”

“The exceptional success of planktivores may be a result of the hotspot’s unique geological configuration and oceanographic currents, which ensure a constant and abundant source of planktonic food,” said co-author Professor David Bellwood, also from Coral CoE at JCU.

“Such stable conditions over the past five million years are likely to have promoted the accumulation of planktivorous fish species in the hotspot.”

While planktivores thrive in the hotspot, they have had a difficult history in more remote areas with the possibility of food shortages and periodic extinctions.

“Planktivore richness drops abruptly away from the marine hotspot—and more so than any of the other dietary categories studied,” Dr Siqueira said.

These findings suggest a vulnerability of planktivorous coral reef fishes to environmental change, despite their species richness within the hotspot.

“We examined the global diversity patterns for more than 3,600 coral reef fishes,” said co-author Dr Pete Cowman from Coral CoE at JCU and Queensland Museum.

Dr Cowman said the research identified a link between biodiversity, food and habitat—emphasising the importance of species interactions with their environment.

“Understanding the ecosystem roles of different species and how they have changed through space and time offers the potential for exciting new insights, as revealed by our planktivores,” Dr Cowman said.

Dr Siqueira said a deeper understanding of species interactions is needed.

“Future research should focus on the ecosystem roles that different species play,” Dr Siqueira said.

“We need to describe changes in the roles of species through space and time, rather than simply documenting species and their numbers; the traditional approach in science.”

PAPER

Siqueira A, Morais R, Bellwood D, Cowman P. (2021). ‘Planktivores as trophic drivers of global coral reef fish diversity’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2019404118

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to Victor Huertas. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACT

Ale Siqueira (limited communication, please contact Melissa at end of release)
E: alexandre.siqueira@my.jcu.edu.au

David Bellwood (Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (07) 4781 4447
E: david.bellwood@jcu.edu.au

Pete Cowman (Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0)490 231 223
E: peter.cowman@jcu.edu.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE at JCU (Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

Scientists say stable seafood consumption amongst the world’s poorer coastal communities is linked to how local habitat characteristics influence fishing at different times of the year.

In the coastal communities of low-income countries, the seafood people catch themselves is often a main food source. In a new study, scientists focused on an often-overlooked type of fishing called gleaning: collecting molluscs, crabs, octopus and reef fish by hand close to shore.

“We surveyed 131 households in eight coastal communities on a small island off Timor-Leste,” said study lead author Ruby Grantham a PhD candidate from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.

Grantham said even though gleaning is important for food security in rough weather—when other types of fishing often aren’t possible—some households don’t do it.

“It’s not just a case of people fishing when they need to. Weather and coastal conditions make fishing activities, including gleaning, dangerous, unsuccessful or even impossible in some places at certain times of the year,” Grantham said.

She said the findings illustrate the ways people interact with, and benefit from, coastal ecosystems. And how this varies between communities and seasons.

The study found the ability of households to glean in rough weather was influenced by the total area and type of shallow habitat close to the community.

“This highlights why we need context-specific understanding of dynamic coastal livelihoods and small-scale fisheries in particular,” Grantham said.

“Even amongst these eight communities on the same small island we found distinct differences in how and when gleaning contributes to household fishing activities and as a source of subsistence seafood.”

Co-author Dr David Mills, Research Leader for the WorldFish Country Program in Timor-Leste, said the research is important for the future management of coastal fisheries.

“In Timor-Leste, low-income households have few opportunities to access the high-quality nutrition available from seafood,” Dr Mills said.

“We know that gleaning fisheries are really important for food security at particular times of the year,” he said.

“And this detailed research will help us develop management approaches that keep fisheries sustainable while also ensuring seafood remains available to those who need it the most, when they need it the most.”

Climate change is altering the world and its environments rapidly. People depend on their interactions with nature for many aspects of wellbeing. Understanding these interactions is critical for diagnosing vulnerabilities and building resilience, especially amongst coastal communities who depend directly on healthy oceans for food.

“The success of coastal livelihood strategies depends on a range of influences that are now, at best, poorly-understood,” Grantham said.

“We wanted to explore how people interact with and benefit from coastal environments through time.”

Grantham said a better understanding of the existing relationships between people and nature, as well as how these influence interactions between societies and local ecosystems, is crucial to legitimate environmental policy and management to ensure sustainable futures.

“We need to further consider the factors influencing how feasible and how desirable social-ecological interactions, like fishing, are across different seasons,” she said.

“These insights of the fine scale dynamics in how people interact with coastal ecosystems through activities such as gleaning can help strengthen our understanding in research, decision-making and management in coastal areas exposed to environmental change.”

PAPER

Grantham R, Álvarez‐Romero J, Mills D, Rojas C, Cumming G. (2021). ‘Spatiotemporal determinants of seasonal gleaning’. People and Nature. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10179

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACT

Ruby Grantham (Townsville, Australia)
E: Ruby.Grantham@my.jcu.edu.au

David Mills (Townsville, Australia)
P: +61 (0) 415 067 551
E: D.Mills@cgiar.org

FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE (Sydney, Australia)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: Melissa.Lyne@jcu.edu.au

An international group of scientists is predicting markedly different outcomes for different species of coral reef fishes under climate change – and have made substantial progress on picking the ‘winners and losers’.

Associate Professor Jodie Rummer from James Cook University’s ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies co-authored a study that exposed two species of coral reef fishes to elevated temperatures and measured their responses over time.

“We collected five-lined cardinalfish and redbelly yellowtail fusilier from the Great Barrier Reef, and under controlled conditions in the laboratory at JCU, slowly raised the temperature in their aquaria by 3.0˚C.

“This temperature range spans the average summer temperatures experienced in the northern Great Barrier Reef. We then routinely measured 18 physiological traits in both species over five weeks,” she said.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts sea surface temperatures are expected to rise by 2.0–4.8˚C by the end of the 21st century, but this is also resulting in the increasing frequency and severity of extreme heatwaves experienced worldwide.

“Over just a few days, these heatwaves can increase water temperatures by as much as 5˚C above seasonal average temperatures, and such heatwaves can last for several weeks,” said Dr Rummer.

She said the fusilier exhibited rapid responses to thermal stress, with nearly immediate changes detected in gill morphology and blood parameters. But the cardinalfish response was delayed, and they seemed far less able to adjust to the elevated temperatures.

Importantly, the team identified seven parameters across both species that may be useful as biomarkers for evaluating how fast and to what extent coral reef fishes can cope with elevated temperatures.

“Our findings greatly improve our current understanding of the physiological responses associated with ongoing thermal threats and disturbances, including which species may be most at risk,” said co-author Assistant Research Professor Jacob Johansen, from the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology.

The researchers said the study is timely, given the rapid decline of tropical coral reefs worldwide, including the unprecedented and repeated mass coral bleaching and mortality events on the Great Barrier Reef in 2016, 2017, and 2020 – all caused by summer heatwaves.

“Climate change winners and losers will ultimately be determined by their capacity to compensate for thermal stress over both the short term of days, weeks, and months, but also over the longer term of years, decades, and centuries,” said co-author Assistant Professor Lauren Nadler from Nova Southeastern University in the United States.

“Our findings are immensely useful for scientists but also for managers, conservation planners, and policy makers charged with protecting these important ecosystems, not to mention communities who rely on coral reef fishes for food, culture, jobs, and livelihoods.

“Collectively, we need to have an indication of which species are going to survive and which will be most vulnerable to climate change so we can take action. The decisions we make today will determine what coral reefs look like tomorrow,” Dr Rummer said.

Contact:

Associate Professor Jodie Rummer (Townsville, AUSTRALIA)
M: 0439 166 171
E: jodie.rummer@jcu.edu.au

Assistant Professor Jacob Johansen (Manoa, Hawaii USA)
M: +1 (808) 236 7478
E: jacob.l.johansen@gmail.com

Assistant Professor Lauren Nadler (Fort Lauderdale, Florida USA)
M: +1 (954) 262 3234
E: lnadler@nova.edu

Article:

Johansen J, Nadler L, Habary A, Bowden A, Rummer J (2021). ‘Thermal acclimation of tropical coral reef fishes to global heat waves’. eLife. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59162

Images here for use with this release. Not for re-use, re-sale or archiving. Please credit as marked.

New research has found as climate change causes the world’s oceans to warm, baby sharks are born smaller, exhausted, undernourished and into environments that are already difficult for them to survive in.

Lead author of the study Carolyn Wheeler is a PhD candidate at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU) and the University of Massachusetts. She examined the effects of increased temperatures on the growth, development and physiological performance of epaulette sharks—an egg-laying species found only on the Great Barrier Reef. She and her team studied the sharks as embryos and as hatchlings.

“We tested shark embryos in waters up to 31°C,” Ms Wheeler said.

“The hotter the conditions, the faster everything happened, which could be a problem for the sharks. The embryos grew faster and used their yolk sac quicker, which is their only source of food as they develop in the egg case. This led to them hatching earlier than usual.”

This meant hatchlings were not only smaller, they needed to feed almost straight away—while lacking significant energy.

Co-author Associate Professor Jodie Rummer, also from Coral CoE at JCU, says the waters of the Great Barrier Reef will likely experience summer averages close to or even in excess of 31°C by the end of the century.

Since sharks don’t care for their eggs after they are laid, a shark egg must be able to survive unprotected for up to four months. Dr Rummer flags rising ocean temperatures as a major concern for the future of all sharks—both egg-laying and live-bearing species.

“The epaulette shark is known for its resilience to change, even to ocean acidification,” Dr Rummer said. “So, if this species can’t cope with warming waters then how will other, less tolerant species fare?” she said.

Sharks and the class of animals they belong to, which includes rays and skates, are slow growing. They also don’t reproduce that often compared to other fishes. The populations of these creatures are already threatened across the globe.

The study suggests the sharks of the future will be born—or hatch, in this case—not only at a disadvantage but into environments that are already at the warmest they can tolerate.

“The study presents a worrying future given that sharks are already threatened,” Ms Wheeler said.

“Sharks are important predators that keep ocean ecosystems healthy. Without predators, whole ecosystems can collapse, which is why we need to keep studying and protecting these creatures.”

“Our future ecosystems depend us taking urgent action to limit climate change,” Dr Rummer said.

The research was a collaborative effort between the Anderson Cabot Center for Ocean Life and the husbandry staff at the New England Aquarium in Boston. The New England Aquarium has a successful breeding program for epaulette sharks.

PAPER

Wheeler C, Rummer J, Bailey B, Lockwood J, Vance S, Mandelman J. (2020). ‘Future thermal regimes for epaulette sharks (Hemiscyllium ocellatum): growth and metabolic performance cease to be optimal’. Scientific Reports, 10: 79953. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79953-0

IMAGES

A selection of images can be used for media stories with credit to the photographer as stated in the caption. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACTS

Carolyn Wheeler
E: carolyn.wheeler@my.jcu.edu.au

A/Prof Jodie Rummer
P: +61 (0)439 166 171
E: jodie.rummer@jcu.edu.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

A new study shows the coastal protection coral reefs currently provide will start eroding by the end of the century, as the world continues to warm and the oceans acidify.

A team of researchers led by Associate Professor Sophie Dove from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at The University of Queensland (Coral CoE at UQ) investigated the ability of coral reef ecosystems to retain deposits of calcium carbonate under current projections of warming and ocean acidification.

Calcium carbonate is what skeletons are made of—and it dissolves under hot, acidic conditions. Marine animals that need calcium carbonate for their skeletons or shells are called ‘calcifiers’. Hard corals have skeletons, which is what gives reefs much of their three-dimensional (3D) structure. It’s this structure that helps protect coasts—and those living on the coasts—from the brunt of waves, floods and storms. Without coral reefs the coasts ‘drown’.

A/Prof Dove says the amount of calcium carbonate within a coral reef ecosystem depends on the biomass of hard corals. But it also depends on the combined impact of warming and acidification on previously deposited calcium carbonate frameworks. She says the results of the study indicate the rate of erosion will overtake the rate of accretion on the majority of present-day reefs.

“Today’s Great Barrier Reef has a 30% calcifier cover,” A/Prof Dove said.

“If CO2 emissions aren’t curbed, by the end-of-century a 50% calcifier cover is required to counter the physical erosion they face from storms and wave impacts,” she said.

“In addition, more than 110% calcifier cover is needed to keep up with the minimal levels of sea-level rise.”

However, A/Prof Dove says both of these scenarios are unlikely because high amounts of hard corals perish with intense underwater heatwaves. Previous studies show marine heatwaves will become chronic in the warmer months of an average year under unmitigated CO2 emissions.

The study was published in today’s Communications Earth & Environment, just after the IUCN World Heritage Outlook 3 rated the Great Barrier Reef as ‘critical’.

A/Prof Dove and her team built experimental reefs closely resembling those of shallow reef slopes at Heron Island on the southern Great Barrier Reef. For 18 months, they studied the effects of future climate scenarios on the ecosystem.

“What we saw was the insidious and accelerated loss of coastal protection under unmitigated CO2 emissions,” said co-author Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, also from Coral CoE at UQ.

“Under current projections, reefs will not simply adapt. Chronic exposure to the combined impacts of ocean warming and acidification will weaken reefs. They won’t be able to re-build after disturbances such as cyclones, nor will they keep up with sea-level rise—possibly for thousands of years,” said co-author Dr Kristen Brown, also from Coral CoE at UQ.

This means many coastal areas currently protected by calcareous coral reefs will no longer be so, impacting coastal infrastructure and communities.

“The combined impact of warming with the acidification of our oceans will see more than the collapse of ecosystems,” A/Prof Dove said.

PAPER

Dove S, Brown K, Van Den Heuvel A, Chai A, Hoegh-Guldberg O. (2020). ‘Ocean warming and acidification uncouple calcification from calcifier biomass which accelerates coral reef decline’. Communications Earth & Environment. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-00054-x

IMAGES

These images are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. No archival permissions are granted. Please ensure all resources carry correct attribution as listed in the file name.

CONTACT

A/Prof Sophie Dove (Brisbane, AEST)
E: s.dove@cms.uq.edu.au

Prof Ove Hoegh-Guldberg (Brisbane, AEST)
E: oveh@uq.edu.au

Dr Kristen Brown (Brisbane, AEST)
P: +61 (0)475 073 741
E: kristen.brown@uq.edu.au

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne/ Coral CoE (Sydney, AEDT)
P: +61 (0)415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

A team of scientists led by the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (Coral CoE) won one of the nation’s top science awards at tonight’s ‘Oscars of Australian science’, the Eureka Prizes.

Professor Josh Cinner leads Social-Ecological Research Frontiers, the winner of the 2020 Eureka Prize for Excellence in Interdisciplinary Scientific Research. The international team includes scientists from seven Australian institutions, with Dr Michele Barnes, Dr Jacqui Lau, Dr Georgina Gurney, Professor Andy Hoey and PhD candidate Jessica Zamborain Mason rounding out the Coral CoE team.

“We study coral reefs bucking the trend and thriving despite climate change, over-fishing and pollution,” Prof Cinner said. “Some coral reefs have surprisingly high amounts of fish despite high human pressures. We call these reefs ‘bright spots’.”

Studying bright spots can help inform new solutions to tackle the decline of reefs worldwide. The team used a blend of social science, ecology and other disciplines to identify and learn more about these unique areas.

“Coral reefs are in crisis. We’re not going to get out of this crisis by doing more of the same,” Dr Barnes said.

She says the aim of their research was to learn from places doing things differently, by uncovering how they withstood the pressures that caused other places to collapse. These lessons are then applied to reef conservation and management in other areas.

The Social-Ecological Research Frontiers team conducted more than 6000 surveys on 2500 reefs across 46 countries.

The insights from the team’s past four years of research would have been impossible within a single discipline—uncovering and understanding bright spots required intense interdisciplinary collaboration.

“To be clear, bright spots aren’t necessarily ‘pristine’ reefs,” Prof Cinner said. “These reefs are doing better than they should be given the pressures they face—reefs that are ‘punching above their weight’.”

The results directly inform the development of fisheries management and conservation.

“Investments that support local involvement and strengthen ownership rights can foster creative solutions to help communities defy anticipated reef degradation,” Dr Lau said.

The team say while the best way to help coral reefs is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, the team hopes their work can also foster a new way of confronting the coral reef crisis.

“We hope it provides inspiration for coral reef researchers who are tired of writing obituaries,” Dr Gurney said.

“I am very honoured to accept this Eureka Prize on behalf of our team and proud of our collaboration and what we’ve achieved by working together,” Prof Cinner said.

The Australian Museum (AM) Eureka Prizes are Australia’s leading science awards. This year marks the 30th anniversary of the awards, which were held as a live, digital event with 51 finalists across 17 prizes on the evening of Tuesday 24 November 2020.

CONTACT

Prof Josh Cinner (Townsville, AEST)
P: + 61 (0)417 714 138
E: joshua.cinner@jcu.edu.au

Dr Michele Barnes (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0)408 677 570
E: michele.barnes@jcu.edu.au

Dr Jacqueline Lau (Townsville, AEST)
P: +61 (0)403 990 738
E: jacqueline.lau@jcu.edu.au

Dr Georgina Gurney (Townsville, AEST)
E: georgina.gurney@gmail.com

MORE INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / Coral CoE (Sydney, AEDT)
P: + 61 (0)414 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

An analytical tool will be used to assess the climate risks facing historic World Heritage sites in Africa—the ruins of two great 13th century ports and the remains of a palace and iron-making industry.

Dr Scott Heron and Jon Day from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (Coral CoE at JCU) developed the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI)—an assessment tool that can be applied to all types of World Heritage properties.

“The CVI is a rapid evaluation tool that was developed to analyse climate risk for World Heritage properties by considering historical and projected climate impacts on the World Heritage values,” said Mr Day.

“It not only assesses the vulnerability of heritage values but, unlike many other tools, also looks at the vulnerability of associated communities based on their economic, social and cultural relationships to those values and their capacity to adapt,” said Dr Heron.

There are currently more than 1,100 World Heritage areas – natural, cultural and mixed – around the world.

The CVI was first applied to Shark Bay in Western Australia and has also been applied to properties in Scotland and northern Europe, with preparations underway in several other locations.

“Our analyses identified World Heritage values in many locations are at high risk to climate impacts – many of these ‘best-of-the-best’ places are already being affected,” said Dr Heron.

Now a global team, led by institutions in Africa and the United Kingdom, will apply the CVI to World Heritage properties in Africa for the first time (the CVI-Africa project).

Scientists will assess the Ruins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Songo Mnara, two trading ports on two islands off the coast of Tanzania through which much of the Indian Ocean’s trade passed between the 13th and 16th centuries, and the remains of a 16th century palace and flourishing iron industry in the valley below—at the Sukur Cultural Landscape in Nigeria.

“Despite the intensifying threat, there is a lack of attention to the cultural dimensions of climate change and this is especially true across the African continent. The CVI-Africa project will help fill this gap,” said Dr Albino Jopela of the African World Heritage Fund.

Africa is projected to warm more rapidly than most other regions in the world, meaning this already vulnerable continent will be hard-hit by the impacts of climate change.

“These climate change impacts are already resulting in the loss and damage of cultural heritage sites across Africa,” said Dr Will Megarry of Queen’s University Belfast, the project’s lead investigator.

“This loss is not limited to historical and archaeological buildings and places, it is also impacting communities and their cultural traditions. How those who care for Africa’s cultural heritage respond to the threat of climate change has profound implications for the resilience of the broader community,” said Dr Megarry.

The CVI-Africa project is made possible through a grant awarded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Global Challenges Research Fund.

Project Website: https://cvi-africa.org/

CONTACTS

Dr Scott Heron (Townsville)
P: +61-404-893-420
E: scott.heron@jcu.edu.au

Albino Jopela (South Africa)
P: +276 6386 0783
E: jopsj@dbsa.org

Will Megarry (Belfast, UK)
P: +44-2890-973448
E: w.megarry@qub.ac.uk

A world-first study on the Great Barrier Reef shows crown-of-thorns starfish have the ability to find their own way home—a behaviour previously undocumented—but only if their neighbourhood is stocked with their favourite food: corals.

Australian researchers observed the starfish emerging from their shelters in the afternoons so they could feed on coral during the night before returning home at dawn.

“The crown-of-thorns starfish often partied all night, slept-in and only those with a well-stocked larder found their way home—so it’s very much a teenager model of behaviour,” said lead author Dr Scott Ling from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies at the University of Tasmania.

“Their preferred prey is Acropora corals,” said co-author Professor Morgan Pratchett from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University (CoralCoE at JCU). Acropora is an important coral species—for the past two million years they have been the building blocks of reefs across the world.

“When populations of Acropora dropped, the starfish didn’t return home,” Prof Pratchett said. “Their behaviour is directly linked to the local abundance of Acropora.”

The results of the study show healthy reefs with a high cover of these corals may encourage crown-of-thorns aggregations and outbreaks. The outbreaks cause extensive, widespread and sustained coral loss throughout the Indo-Pacific region.

Similar examples of predator infestations driving environmental devastation include sea urchins overgrazing on kelp forests and coral reef fishes munching through patches of seagrass.

The researchers used in-situ time-lapse photography to track the movements of 58 starfish in the northern and southern Great Barrier Reef during an outbreak in 2015. In the absence of their preferred Acropora coral prey, starfish were typically homeless and instead roamed up to 20 metres per day.

“Unlike sea urchins that can switch diet once they overgraze kelp forests, results of the time-lapse monitoring indicate that the starfish will consume available Acropora and ultimately eat themselves out of house and home before dispersing in search of new feeding grounds,” Dr Ling said.

Previous outbreaks on the Great Barrier Reef were recorded in 1962, 1979, 1993 and 2009. Though mass-coral bleaching due to global warming is now the greatest threat to coral reefs worldwide, the combined impact of mass-bleaching and crown-of-thorns outbreaks is potentially catastrophic for coral reefs.

“By better understanding the behaviour of these starfish we can help prevent and control their outbreaks, which will help alleviate the pressures on coral reefs,” Prof Pratchett said.

PAPER

Ling S, Cowan Z, Boada J. Flukes B, Pratchett M. (2020). ‘Homing behaviour by destructive crown-of-thorns starfish is triggered by local availability of coral prey’. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1341

IMAGERY

Photos and video are available for media use here. Please note these are for single use with this story only, not for any other story. Credit must be given to the content owner in the filename. No archival permissions are granted.

CONTACTS

Prof Morgan Pratchett (AEST, Townsville)
P: +61 (0)488 112 295
E: morgan.pratchett@jcu.edu.au

Dr Scott Ling (AEDT, Hobart)
P: +61 (0)418376240
E: scott.ling@utas.edu.au

FURTHER INFORMATION

Melissa Lyne / CoralCoE at JCU (AEDT, Sydney)
P: +61 (0) 415 514 328
E: melissa.lyne@jcu.edu.au

Seminars

More
Australian Research Council Pandora

Partner Research Institutions

Partner Partner Partner Partner
Coral Reef Studies

ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
James Cook University Townsville
Queensland 4811 Australia

Phone: 61 7 4781 4000
Email: info@coralcoe.org.au